Indiana State University OSPIRE
Statistics > Surveys > 1997
SENIOR SURVEY REPORT, SPRING 1997

INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY

Introduction

The Senior Survey was administered differently in the Spring of 1997 than it was in 1996. Last year, the questionnaire was sent out with student diplomas, resulting in a response rate of 35.8% (387 responses of 1,080 surveys sent). Since diplomas are sent as schools/colleges approve the student’s graduating status, the last batch of surveys was sent as late as October of 1996. This led to students filling out the questionnaire at very different points in their post-graduate experience, which may have skewed the results. This year, in an attempt to address this problem, questionnaires were sent to all students who had applied for graduation by the end of the Spring 1997 term. In an attempt to motivate students to return the survey, they were asked to verify the address to which their diplomas would be sent. The result was an increased response rate of 54% (455 responses out of 840 surveys sent). A brief synopsis of the results of that survey is presented here; a more in-depth report accompanies this brief.

Overall, Senior Satisfaction is Up

In general, graduating seniors remain satisfied with most aspects of the University (see Table 1). As in 1996, students indicated very high satisfaction (89%) with the entire ISU experience, and with the educational experience in particular. An overwhelming percentage of students (93%) appreciate the intellectual and personal growth they experienced while at ISU, while 90% say they are satisfied with the value of their education and classroom instruction. Roughly 3 out of 4 students said they were satisfied with career preparation and preparation for future education. Overall, these results show that among 1997 graduates, satisfaction with the educational experience is slightly higher (1%-5%) than that of 1996 graduates.

Students also appear to appreciate the campus and various resources available to them. Large percentages of students indicated satisfaction with the appearance of campus grounds and buildings, the student union, and the library. These findings were the same or slightly higher (1%-2%) than results for 1996. One instance for which 1997 results are down from 1996 is satisfaction with the computer labs; in 1997, 71% of graduates indicated satisfaction, compared to 75% in 1996.

The 1997 seniors also appeared to be slightly more satisfied with services such as registration and senior checkout, safety and security, student activities, and recreation than their predecessors. The 1997 seniors also appeared more satisfied with resources such as the Career Center, Counseling Center and Student Life Office. In most areas, 1997 graduates rated services 1%-6% higher than 1996 graduates did; however, there were two exceptions. One decrease occurred in recreational sports, for which satisfaction dropped from 60% in 1996 to 53% in 1997. The other decrease occurred in satisfaction with the Student Health Center; only 47% of 1997 seniors indicated satisfaction compared to 58% of 1996 seniors.

As in past years, students appear to be least satisfied with four areas: parking, Financial Aid, fee payments, and General Education requirements. As with 1996 graduates, parking is the leading source of student dissatisfaction among 1997 graduates, with over half of respondents (56%) indicating dissatisfaction. On a positive note, these results have improved since 1996, when 67% of respondents indicated dissatisfaction. Financial Aid and fee payments are also areas in which students register dissatisfaction. Only 23% of respondents registered satisfaction with Financial Aid, and 35% registered dissatisfaction. Although there is less satisfaction among 1997 graduates as compared to 1996 (33%), there are also fewer students indicating dissatisfaction (42% in 1996). This suggests that 1997 seniors have more neutral feelings towards Financial Aid services than 1996 seniors did. As for the fee payment situation, 35% indicated satisfaction while 26% indicated dissatisfaction, a result that is almost identical to 1996. Results further reveal that graduates still have negative feelings towards General Education requirements. In 1996, 54% indicated satisfaction and 19% indicated dissatisfaction; this year, results are slightly worse: only 48% indicated satisfaction, while 25% indicated dissatisfaction. The root of these negative feelings is unclear. One possibility is that students are reacting to having to take General Education courses that they do not wish to take.

Seniors Are Satisfied With Faculty

Like their predecessors, the 1997 seniors hold their most favorable views toward the academic aspects of ISU. Several questions were posed on the survey to probe what aspects of their education were most satisfactory to seniors. Faculty in their major registered the most satisfaction among graduating seniors (see Table 2), with 84% of respondents indicating satisfaction with the teaching ability of faculty in their major, and 83% indicating satisfaction with the professional expertise of faculty in their major. These results are essentially identical to 1996.

Other areas in which 1997 graduates appeared satisfied include opportunities for interaction with faculty, instruction evaluation, ability of other students in the major, and feedback from instructors. Also appreciated was how well the academic experience prepared the students for employment and graduate or professional school. These results indicated slightly higher satisfaction (4%-7%) than in 1996.

Areas in which students felt least satisfied were career counseling, academic advising in General Education, information on internships, academic advising in their major, and scheduling in their major. Dissatisfaction with scheduling in major and academic advising in General Education decreased slightly (3-4%) from 1996 to 1997; in 1996, 21% of seniors indicated dissatisfaction with scheduling in their major and 32% were unhappy with the academic advising in General Education. An almost identical percentage of 1996 and 1997 seniors (24%) indicated dissatisfaction with academic advising in their majors. Areas that showed slight increases (1-3%) in dissatisfaction from 1996 to 1997 were information on internships and career counseling, which in 1996 registered 23% and 27% dissatisfaction, respectively.

Seniors Are Satisfied With Residence Hall Life

Overall, seniors are still satisfied with residence hall life (see Table 3). Of those students who lived in the residence halls, the majority are satisfied with all aspects probed except privacy. These results are very similar to, and perhaps slightly higher than, those found in 1996. Then, satisfaction with the social climate, the academic climate, and the quality of food was 2%-6% less than figures for 1997. The 1997 seniors, although slightly less satisfied (5%) with the privacy in the residence halls, were also less dissatisfied (5%) than 1996 seniors, suggesting more neutral feelings. The only aspect with which 1997 seniors appeared to be less satisfied was physical facilities; however, the margin was slight - only 3% fewer 1997 seniors indicated satisfaction.

Seniors Feel Prepared

Survey results suggest that 1997 graduates, like their 1996 counterparts, generally agree that ISU has prepared them well in various skills associated with higher education (see Table 4). In most areas, the 1997 results are almost identical to those for 1996; however, in two areas, speaking and using mathematics, 1997 seniors felt slightly better prepared. In 1996, only 80% of seniors felt well prepared in speaking and 57% felt well prepared in using mathematics.

Seniors Work and Study

As found with previous graduating classes, the majority of 1997 graduates work while attending school. Almost three-fourths of 1997 graduates worked at least one part-time job during their last semester at ISU, and 28% worked at least one full-time job, or two or more part-time jobs (see Table 5). These findings are down slightly from 1996 when 77% of respondents indicated that they worked at least one part-time job and 31% indicated that they worked at least one full-time job or two or more part-time jobs. Students were also asked about their plans for the coming year. Over a third indicated that they had not yet found a job and would continue looking. This number is substantially larger than in 1996, when 19% indicated that they were unemployed.

The differences in results between 1996 and 1997 are likely due in large part to slight differences in the survey instrument and method of distribution. In 1996, students were asked about their working situation during the last two years as opposed to their last semester, and since surveys were sent as part of the graduation packet, some graduates received the survey as late as October. In 1997, surveys were distributed to seniors who had applied for graduation; thus, surveys were all sent at the same time in the spring. The delay in 1996 meant that students were given much more time to find employment before filling out the survey, which likely resulted in a lower percentage of unemployed graduates than in 1997. Also, because the 1996 survey asked about the employment situation during the last two years, many of the 1996 respondents may have referred to their work experience after graduation while filling out the survey, thus making it appear as though they worked more than 1997 graduates.

Other findings about employment are almost identical to those found in the 1996 senior survey: 17% of students intend to remain in their current job, but look for work in their major, and 12% indicated that they intended to attend school in the year directly following graduation.

Other survey questions tried to ascertain the number of hours students spent working, studying and socializing during a typical week. As Table 6 indicates, 53% of students studied at least 11 hours per week, and 22% spend 11 or more hours socializing on campus. Around one-third of students are employed on campus, and 57% are employed off campus. Twenty-four percent of seniors spent at least 11 hours per week employed off campus, compared to 51% who spent at least 11 hours per week employed on campus. When the responses to these questions are compared to those of the 1996 graduates, findings suggest that 1997 seniors tend to study less; in 1996, only 41% of students said they studied less than 10 hours per week, whereas in 1997, 47% did. All other responses were essentially the same.

Graduating Seniors Are Connected to Campus

Many studies suggest that success at college is related to the degree to which students are integrated into the campus community. In order to assess the connection of our students to the campus, students were asked several questions about how often they attended social functions and sporting events on and around ISU. As Table 7 indicates, 45% of seniors attended at least one sporting event per month and 46% typically attended at least one social event per month. About one third of students typically attended at least one artistic event, and roughly the same percentage attended at least one sorority/fraternity event per month. Of those seniors who did participate in fraternity/sorority events, a large percentage of them (20%) attended six or more functions in a typical month. These results are essentially identical to those for 1996.

As another means of gauging the attachment of students to campus, seniors were asked what percentage of their friends were ISU students and what percentage of their free time was spent on campus (no table shown). Fifty-two percent of respondents indicated that over half of their friends were ISU students, while 70% indicated that at least 25% of their friends were ISU students. As for free time, 39% indicated that they spent over half of their time outside of class on campus, while 87% said they spent at least 25% of their free time on campus. These findings are very similar to those for 1996.

Conclusions

As was found with 1996 graduates, 1997 graduates appear to be generally satisfied with the overall ISU experience. They are most satisfied with the academic experience, particularly the faculty in their major. The majority are satisfied with the residence halls, and most agree that ISU has prepared them well in most skills usually associated with higher education. For most factors, satisfaction among 1997 graduates was the same or slightly higher than that of 1996 graduates, although a few indicators are down slightly.

As with previous graduating classes, the majority of 1997 seniors worked at least one part-time job while attending school. Results suggest that 1997 graduates worked less during school and have a greater instance of unemployment than 1996 graduates; however, the differences between results for the two years are most likely due to minor differences in the survey instrument and method of distribution. As with 1996 graduates, 1997 graduates appear to be well connected to campus, with a substantial percentage of students regularly attending campus events.

This brief focuses on presenting a synopsis of the results of the 1997 Senior Survey; a more in-depth analysis is done in a separate brief. The focus of that brief is to attempt to identify background factors that affect student success by exploring differences between students who have graduated and other students. The brief also investigates how background factors affect student satisfaction among 1997 graduates.

Graphs
 
 

 
Office of Institutional Research & Testing
Indiana State University
Rankin Hall, Room 419 Telephone: 237-2305
 
Kevin Snider, Director of Institutional Research
plbkevin@amber.indstate.edu
Concetta DePaolo, Institutional Research Analyst
plbcetta@amber.indstate.edu,
 

Copyright © by Indiana State University.